[Python Home] [PEP Index] [PEP Source] |
PEP: | 326 |
---|---|
Title: | A Case for Top and Bottom Values |
Version: | 1772 |
Last-Modified: | 2004-02-23 18:47:53 -0800 (Mon, 23 Feb 2004) |
Author: | Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu>, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> |
Status: | Rejected |
Type: | Standards Track |
Content-Type: | text/x-rst |
Created: | 20-Dec-2003 |
Python-Version: | 2.4 |
Post-History: | 20-Dec-2003, 03-Jan-2004, 05-Jan-2004, 07-Jan-2004, 21-Feb-2004 |
This PEP has been rejected by the BDFL [12]. As per the pseudo-sunset clause [13], PEP 326 is being updated one last time with the latest suggestions, code modifications, etc., and includes a link to a module [14] that implements the behavior described in the PEP. Users who desire the behavior listed in this PEP are encouraged to use the module for the reasons listed in Independent Implementations?.
This PEP proposes two singleton constants that represent a top and bottom [3] value: Max and Min (or two similarly suggestive names [4]; see Open Issues).
As suggested by their names, Max and Min would compare higher or lower than any other object (respectively). Such behavior results in easier to understand code and fewer special cases in which a temporary minimum or maximum value is required, and an actual minimum or maximum numeric value is not limited.
While None can be used as an absolute minimum that any value can attain [1], this may be depreciated [4] in Python 3.0, and shouldn't be relied upon.
As a replacement for None being used as an absolute minimum, as well as the introduction of an absolute maximum, the introduction of two singleton constants Max and Min address concerns for the constants to be self-documenting.
What is commonly done to deal with absolute minimum or maximum values, is to set a value that is larger than the script author ever expects the input to reach, and hope that it isn't reached.
Guido has brought up [2] the fact that there exists two constants that can be used in the interim for maximum values: sys.maxint and floating point positive infinity (1e309 will evaluate to positive infinity). However, each has their drawbacks.
On most architectures sys.maxint is arbitrarily small (2**31-1 or 2**63-1) and can be easily eclipsed by large 'long' integers or floating point numbers.
Comparing long integers larger than the largest floating point number representable against any float will result in an exception being raised:
>>> cmp(1.0, 10**309) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? OverflowError: long int too large to convert to float
Even when large integers are compared against positive infinity:
>>> cmp(1e309, 10**309) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? OverflowError: long int too large to convert to float
These same drawbacks exist when numbers are negative.
Introducing Max and Min that work as described above does not take much effort. A sample Python reference implementation of both is included.
There are hundreds of algorithms that begin by initializing some set of values to a logical (or numeric) infinity or negative infinity. Python lacks either infinity that works consistently or really is the most extreme value that can be attained. By adding Max and Min, Python would have a real maximum and minimum value, and such algorithms can become clearer due to the reduction of special cases.
When testing various kinds of servers, it is sometimes necessary to only serve a certain number of clients before exiting, which results in code like the following:
count = 5 def counts(stop): i = 0 while i < stop: yield i i += 1 for client_number in counts(count): handle_one_client()
When using Max as the value assigned to count, our testing server becomes a production server with minimal effort.
As another example, in Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm on a graph with weighted edges (all positive).
Below is an example of Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm on a graph with weighted edges using a table (a faster version that uses a heap is available, but this version is offered due to its similarity to the description above, the heap version is available via older versions of this document through CVS [10]).
def DijkstraSP_table(graph, S, T): table = {} #3 for node in graph.iterkeys(): #(visited, distance, node, parent) table[node] = (0, Max, node, None) #1 table[S] = (0, 0, S, None) #2 cur = min(table.values()) #4a while (not cur[0]) and cur[1] < Max: #4 (visited, distance, node, parent) = cur table[node] = (1, distance, node, parent) #4b for cdist, child in graph[node]: #4c ndist = distance+cdist #| if not table[child][0] and ndist < table[child][1]:#| table[child] = (0, ndist, child, node) #|_ cur = min(table.values()) #4a if not table[T][0]: return None cur = T #5 path = [T] #| while table[cur][3] is not None: #| path.append(table[cur][3]) #| cur = path[-1] #| path.reverse() #| return path #|_
Readers should note that replacing Max in the above code with an arbitrarily large number does not guarantee that the shortest path distance to a node will never exceed that number. Well, with one caveat: one could certainly sum up the weights of every edge in the graph, and set the 'arbitrarily large number' to that total. However, doing so does not make the algorithm any easier to understand and has potential problems with numeric overflows.
Gustavo Niemeyer [9] points out that using a more Pythonic data structure than tuples, to store information about node distances, increases readability. Two equivalent node structures (one using None, the other using Max) and their use in a suitably modified Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm is given below.
class SuperNode: def __init__(self, node, parent, distance, visited): self.node = node self.parent = parent self.distance = distance self.visited = visited class MaxNode(SuperNode): def __init__(self, node, parent=None, distance=Max, visited=False): SuperNode.__init__(self, node, parent, distance, visited) def __cmp__(self, other): return cmp((self.visited, self.distance), (other.visited, other.distance)) class NoneNode(SuperNode): def __init__(self, node, parent=None, distance=None, visited=False): SuperNode.__init__(self, node, parent, distance, visited) def __cmp__(self, other): pair = ((self.visited, self.distance), (other.visited, other.distance)) if None in (self.distance, other.distance): return -cmp(*pair) return cmp(*pair) def DijkstraSP_table_node(graph, S, T, Node): table = {} #3 for node in graph.iterkeys(): table[node] = Node(node) #1 table[S] = Node(S, distance=0) #2 cur = min(table.values()) #4a sentinel = Node(None).distance while not cur.visited and cur.distance != sentinel: #4 cur.visited = True #4b for cdist, child in graph[node]: #4c ndist = distance+cdist #| if not table[child].visited and\ #| ndist < table[child].distance: #| table[child].distance = ndist #|_ cur = min(table.values()) #4a if not table[T].visited: return None cur = T #5 path = [T] #| while table[cur].parent is not None: #| path.append(table[cur].parent) #| cur = path[-1] #| path.reverse() #| return path #|_
In the above, passing in either NoneNode or MaxNode would be sufficient to use either None or Max for the node distance 'infinity'. Note the additional special case required for None being used as a sentinel in NoneNode in the __cmp__ method.
This example highlights the special case handling where None is used as a sentinel value for maximum values "in the wild", even though None itself compares smaller than any other object in the standard distribution.
As an aside, it is not clear to to the author that using Nodes as a replacement for tuples has increased readability significantly, if at all.
An example of usage for Min is an algorithm that solves the following problem [6]:
Suppose you are given a directed graph, representing a communication network. The vertices are the nodes in the network, and each edge is a communication channel. Each edge (u, v) has an associated value r(u, v), with 0 <= r(u, v) <= 1, which represents the reliability of the channel from u to v (i.e., the probability that the channel from u to v will not fail). Assume that the reliability probabilities of the channels are independent. (This implies that the reliability of any path is the product of the reliability of the edges along the path.) Now suppose you are given two nodes in the graph, A and B.
Such an algorithm is a 7 line modification to the DijkstraSP_table algorithm given above (modified lines prefixed with *):
def DijkstraSP_table(graph, S, T): table = {} #3 for node in graph.iterkeys(): #(visited, distance, node, parent) * table[node] = (0, Min, node, None) #1 * table[S] = (0, 1, S, None) #2 * cur = max(table.values()) #4a * while (not cur[0]) and cur[1] > Min: #4 (visited, distance, node, parent) = cur table[node] = (1, distance, node, parent) #4b for cdist, child in graph[node]: #4c * ndist = distance*cdist #| * if not table[child][0] and ndist > table[child][1]:#| table[child] = (0, ndist, child, node) #|_ * cur = max(table.values()) #4a if not table[T][0]: return None cur = T #5 path = [T] #| while table[cur][3] is not None: #| path.append(table[cur][3]) #| cur = path[-1] #| path.reverse() #| return path #|_
Note that there is a way of translating the graph to so that it can be passed unchanged into the original DijkstraSP_table algorithm. There also exists a handful of easy methods for constructing Node objects that would work with DijkstraSP_table_node. Such translations are left as an exercise to the reader.
Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. [7] has pointed out that various data structures involving range searching have immediate use for Max and Min values. More specifically; Segment trees, Range trees, k-d trees and database keys:
...The issue is that a range can be open on one side and does not always have an initialized case.
The solutions I have seen are to either overload None as the extremum or use an arbitrary large magnitude number. Overloading None means that the built-ins can't really be used without special case checks to work around the undefined (or "wrongly defined") ordering of None. These checks tend to swamp the nice performance of built-ins like max() and min().
Choosing a large magnitude number throws away the ability of Python to cope with arbitrarily large integers and introduces a potential source of overrun/underrun bugs.
Further use examples of both Max and Min are available in the realm of graph algorithms, range searching algorithms, computational geometry algorithms, and others.
Independent implementations of the Min/Max concept by users desiring such functionality are not likely to be compatible, and certainly will produce inconsistent orderings. The following examples seek to show how inconsistent they can be.
Let us pretend we have created proper separate implementations of MyMax, MyMin, YourMax and YourMin with the same code as given in the sample implementation (with some minor renaming):
>>> lst = [YourMin, MyMin, MyMin, YourMin, MyMax, YourMin, MyMax, YourMax, MyMax] >>> lst.sort() >>> lst [YourMin, YourMin, MyMin, MyMin, YourMin, MyMax, MyMax, YourMax, MyMax]
Notice that while all the "Min"s are before the "Max"s, there is no guarantee that all instances of YourMin will come before MyMin, the reverse, or the equivalent MyMax and YourMax.
The problem is also evident when using the heapq module:
>>> lst = [YourMin, MyMin, MyMin, YourMin, MyMax, YourMin, MyMax, YourMax, MyMax] >>> heapq.heapify(lst) #not needed, but it can't hurt >>> while lst: print heapq.heappop(lst), ... YourMin MyMin YourMin YourMin MyMin MyMax MyMax YourMax MyMax
Furthermore, the findmin_Max code and both versions of Dijkstra could result in incorrect output by passing in secondary versions of Max.
It has been pointed out [9] that the reference implementation given below would be incompatible with independent implementations of Max/Min. The point of this PEP is for the introduction of "The One True Implementation" of "The One True Maximum" and "The One True Minimum". User-based implementations of Max and Min objects would thusly be discouraged, and use of "The One True Implementation" would obviously be encouraged. Ambiguous behavior resulting from mixing users' implementations of Max and Min with "The One True Implementation" should be easy to discover through variable and/or source code introspection.
class _ExtremeType(object): def __init__(self, cmpr, rep): object.__init__(self) self._cmpr = cmpr self._rep = rep def __cmp__(self, other): if isinstance(other, self.__class__) and\ other._cmpr == self._cmpr: return 0 return self._cmpr def __repr__(self): return self._rep Max = _ExtremeType(1, "Max") Min = _ExtremeType(-1, "Min")
Results of Test Run:
>>> max(Max, 2**65536) Max >>> min(Max, 2**65536) 20035299304068464649790... (lines removed for brevity) ...72339445587895905719156736L >>> min(Min, -2**65536) Min >>> max(Min, -2**65536) -2003529930406846464979... (lines removed for brevity) ...072339445587895905719156736L
As the PEP was rejected, all open issues are now closed and inconsequential. The module will use the names UniversalMaximum and UniversalMinimum due to the fact that it would be very difficult to mistake what each does. For those who require a shorter name, renaming the singletons during import is suggested:
from extremes import UniversalMaximum as uMax, UniversalMinimum as uMin
[1] | RE: [Python-Dev] Re: Got None. Maybe Some?, Peters, Tim (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041374.html) |
[2] | Re: [Python-Dev] Got None. Maybe Some?, van Rossum, Guido (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041352.html) |
[3] | RE: [Python-Dev] Got None. Maybe Some?, Peters, Tim (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041332.html) |
[4] | (1, 2) [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 326 now online, Reedy, Terry (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041685.html) |
[5] | [Python-Dev] PEP 326 now online, Chermside, Michael (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041704.html) |
[6] | Homework 6, Problem 7, Dillencourt, Michael (link may not be valid in the future) (http://www.ics.uci.edu/~dillenco/ics161/hw/hw6.pdf) |
[7] | RE: [Python-Dev] PEP 326 now online, Lentvorski, Andrew P., Jr. (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041727.html) |
[8] | Re: It's not really Some is it?, Ippolito, Bob (http://www.livejournal.com/users/chouyu_31/138195.html?thread=274643#t274643) |
[9] | (1, 2) [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 326 now online, Niemeyer, Gustavo (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042261.html); [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 326 now online, Carlson, Josiah (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042272.html) |
[10] | PEP-0326 CVS, Carlson, Josiah (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0326.txt) |
[11] | [Python-Dev] PEP 326 (quick location possibility), Carlson, Josiah (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042275.html) |
[12] | (1, 2) [Python-Dev] PEP 326 (quick location possibility), van Rossum, Guido (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042306.html) |
[13] | [Python-Dev] PEP 326 (quick location possibility), Carlson, Josiah (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042300.html) |
[14] | Recommended standard implementation of PEP 326, extremes.py, Carlson, Josiah (http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jcarlson/pep326/extremes.py) |
This document has been placed in the public domain.